I THINK i'VE ONLY SEEN DR.DRACULA , ONCE. I DON'T REMEMBER LOVIN' OR HATIN' IT....I JUST LOVE WHAT ADAMSON STOOD FOR , WHICH WAS BREAKING THE RULES , EVEN THE ONES IMPOSED ON B-MOVIES. HE JUMPED OVER HURDLES A TARENTINO COULD'NT GET OVER WITH A CHERRY PICKER . TO GET THE MOVIE DONE , ON TIME , THEN DO THE SAME DAMN THING , IF NECESSARY , ALL OVER AGAIN.
I LOVE IT - "VERY LITTLE DRACULA VERSUSING FRANKENSTEIN" , WHILE THAT'S TRUE , THERE'S THE BUILDUP , WHERE THE MONSTER WANTS TO KICK DRACULA'S ASS OVER REGINA CARROLL , BUT , IS STILL IN HIS POWER. THE REAL SHOWDOWN DOES'NT HAPPEN TIL THE END....
HOW MANY MOVIES IN THE PRE "GORE UBER ALLES " DAYS (80's to the present.) ARE GOING TO SHOW DRACULA (Arguably the stronger of the two creatures , depending on how strong his mojo is , that night.) RIPPING THE MONSTER'S ARMS AND HEAD OFF ?!! it was later confirmed that this scene DID inspire the "Black Knight" bit in "Monty Python and The Holy Grail". "HORROR OF THE BLOOD MONSTERS " AND "SATAN'S SADISTS" , I LIKE A LOT , TOO...."Blood of Ghastly Horror" , i FOUND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW . IT WAS MADE , OF COURSE , FROM PARTS OF "PSYCHO A-GO -GO"......."THE MAN WITH THE SYNTHETIC BRAIN" WAS A BETTER TITLE , AT LEAST , BUT THE DISTRIBUTORS DEMANDED WORDS LIKE "HORROR" , "BLOOD" AND "FRANKENSTEIN" BE THROWN AROUND A LOT.
Well , like a lot of (Sensible) people in my age bracket , I saw movies like "Dracula Versus Frankenstein" and "Frankenstein's Bloody Terror" on late night TV , for the first time. "D vs. F", EVEN THEN , had a distinct lack of continuity that could only partly be attributed to the severe editing for Television. I understood where they were going with it , but , not what they picked up along the way. IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO ME , NOW. THAT'S what's scary !
Greg Hanson said:
I generally love Adamson schlock. DvF is kind of amazingly appalling. But like so many films donning lurid titles, it didn't even deliver very much on the premise espoused in the title - AKA there was very little Dracula versusing Frankenstein! It was still a fun one, though definitely difficult to sit through.
I'd say Adamson's worst is definitely Doctor Dracula, which was more than a chore to sit through. I am very partial to Horror of the Blood Monsters, Psycho A Go-Go, Satan's Sadists, and Black Samurai as they all have some high-quality camp. Similar to Ted Mikels in really often tip-toeing on the line of fun and abhorrent.
John Battles said:
Just watched "Dracula Vs. Frankenstein" for the umpteenth time. I know we spoke of it , earlier , somewhere around here...... If you think it's hard to follow , you have'nt seen the celebrated back catalogue of AL Adamson . Barring "Satan's Sadists" (Which this movie was intended as a sequel to , without any monsters , an idea that cost Russ Tamblyn's appearance , one of his last on film ,to being reduced to not much more than a cameo.), it IS one of Adamson's most coherent features. It also did'nt help that the movie was released at least three times ,with titles such as "Blood of Frankenstein" and Even "Teenage Dracula". It was marketed as a "Sex" picture (There is very moderate nudity.)and even as a Musical ! (There are two songs in the film, barring soundtrack music borrowed from Universal Horror films.)......The real source of confusion , though , was that two , unrelated , movies , were released under the same name , at roughly the same time - The Paul Naschy/Michael Rennie Sci Fi - Monster Mash (aka "The Man Who Came From Ummo") - Dracula and Frankenstein's monster don't even meet ! and Jesse (Jesus) Franco's Monster Bash . "Dracula , Prisoner of Frankenstein".
But , if you see Al Adamson's magnum opus of schlock , several times (As I suggest.) , the seemingly unrelated subplots and teh herky - jerky editing will all make sense.
Hot and Sour Soup (Thai)
Ingredients:
Preparation: