I think that Greg’s point was that despite Burroughs work being controversial it still warrants attention and study particularly because his ideas pertaining to information and language as a virus are concepts we are confronted with today.
Controversial was not the “magic word”. “Viral information” is.
Greg makes an interesting point. Sleazy does not. How exactly does William Burroughs represent the very essence of Anglo-Saxon society? Burroughs was a homosexual, a heroin addict and a free thinker. Certainly not my idea of a redneck.
To me Burroughs was always the visionary of the Beat trinity (that includes Kerouac and Ginsberg respectively). Burroughs work with cut-ups, the dream machine, and even the Orgone Accumulator seemed to me more in the Post Punk or Cyber Punk direction than the Hippy or Jazz-ma-tazz concepts of his contemporaries.
Now I would like to keep this thread firmly on Greg’s topic but there is one thing that needs clarifying – Sleazy, just what is it that non Anglo-Saxons (!) don’t understand about your “culture”?
(of course we thought you meant the non Latin world. One could also say, 'the non white world'.)