I just finished Dave Thompson's book on glam rock, titled "Children of the Revolution," and a prominent British glam rock musician is quoted as saying that Americans hate fun after his band toured the states. Maybe glam was just too frivolous for American audiences.
I also read Barney Hoskyn's book on glam rock, titled "Glam: Bowie, Bolan, and the Glitter Rock Revolution." According to Hoskyns and several people that he interviewed for his research, most Americans were also turned off to glam because of the androgyny and the homoerotic overtones. Alice Cooper hit it big because he downplayed the androgyny and went for more of a Hammer horror image; KISS sprung from the NYC glam scene and hit it big because they went for a more macho image with a harder rocking sound. However, the New York Dolls failed because American audiences were repulsed by their androgynous image.
Anyway, I'm paraphrasing those books because I'm too young to remember the original glam era.
matthew rosedon said:
It's fascinating reading all these comments about the obscurity of glam in the US. If you're my age (53) and from the UK these bands were the soundtrack to your teenage years. Glam was absolutely massive here - Slade had 6 number 1 singles when a number 1 single in the UK really meant something and Bolan was the biggest star since The Beatles (trust me, that is not an exaggeration). And yet, as has been pointed out they all meant next to nothing in the States. It's not as if the US has been totally resistant to UK music over the years so why didn't you Americans go for glam? Your theories please...