Sounds fair enough. Thanks for the suggestion!
Alison said:
*Sigh* I have already apologized, but you seem intent on twisting my statements to make it seem like I'm this complete troublemakin' troll. I suppose I should shut up at this point, but I just wish you would consider that as a member, having the moderator publicly shut down your post for not being good enough in quality can feel both insulting and embarrassing.
Instead, consider posting a discussion asking members what they think the most appropriate topics are for the main discussion forum. Consider then taking the consensus opinions and posting them as "strong suggestions" for posting under the network guidelines. When someone posts a topic that is not "thought provoking enough" consider emailing the member and asking them to change the topic so it will be more discussion oriented, thus educating the member, allowing them to stay in control of their own posts, and preventing them from being embarrassed.
joey fuckup said:I know you said your remarks about Gringo were "tongue in cheek", but this has happened before. Gringo had to shut down two threads by the same member because they turned into an outright battle. So the member decides to publicly on here insult him because he was doing his job. How are any of us to know that what you posted wasn't serious?
Also, you said it was in your nature to "challenge authority". Look, we have enough to look into than a Hideout member willfully wanting to challenge us and push our buttons. I'm not trying to be a bully here, but if you think it's funny to do that, think again.